I think I must agree here that some things GC see as needing 
heavy-handedness.  They decided to archive one of my caches that I 
temporally archived because I had not replaced it within 30 days.  I 
explained in a note that I was laid up with a serious leg injury and 
would get to it asap.  I don't think they read that but just acted on 
the flag on my tempory archive.  Which by the way must be fairly new as 
they threatened to archive another of my caches when I temporally 
archived it over a year ago and the flag just popped up.  I found that I 
needed to post a different kind of log other than just a note.

I still look after a couple of caches for away owner that are close to 
me.

Anyway, we get a note whenever our caches are logged on line and should 
act on the note if needed.

Jumping off box onto bad leg Ouch!!
Bob Smith, Team Petite Elite, Prescott, AZ
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ShadowAce
  To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
  Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 8:51 PM
  Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] New Fake cache logger - FYI


  Sorry, I have to disagree

   If a cache owner can not maintain a cache then it should be removed 
in my opinion. I agree with groundspeak on this as only two things stop 
false logging.. 1 ) cache owner confirms and removes fake logs 2 ) the 
cache goes bubye

   So before you point a finger at the Heavy Handed Groundspeak, maybe 
smack your fellow cachers for being lazy and not caring?

  = Dirk / ShadowAce