Sorry, I have to disagree

 If a cache owner can not maintain a cache then it should be removed in my
opinion. I agree with groundspeak on this as only two things stop false
logging.. 1 ) cache owner confirms and removes fake logs 2 ) the cache goes
bubye

 So before you point a finger at the Heavy Handed Groundspeak, maybe smack
your fellow cachers for being lazy and not caring?

= Dirk / ShadowAce

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Richard Hansen <richard.hansen@dos2unix.net
> wrote:

> Typical heavyhandedness by groundspeak, looking for any excuse to get rid
> of virts.
>
>
> =
> Richard Hansen
>
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:35 PM, AZcachemeister <azcachemeister@getnet.net>
> wrote:
>
> I do see in a related thread in the Geocaching forums, that (per a reviewer
> and forum mod no less reliable than KEYSTONE) FAILURE to delete logs by
> known 'armchair loggers' can constitute a lack of maintenance by the cache
> owner, and grounds for archival.
> C'mon cache owners, lets get this mess cleaned up!
>
> ACM
>
>