Matt:
Well here is my two pennies worth.
As to Magellan who would want a GPS named after an Explorer that died on route.
Garmin is the way to go.   I started out with the ancient Garmin 38 where if I received
an accuracy of 40 feet I was tickled pink.   Then I went on to a Vista and that one
served me well over 5 years, and that is a lot of map work for the USFS in addition to
caching.
Last year I went to the Legend HCX with maps and it works as well as the best of 
them out there, except Trimble.   Go to the Garmin Website and you can do a comparison
of the makes and models.
Cache on.
Tahosa - Treker of the San Tans
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matthew Shapiro<mailto:sonburnt@gmail.com> 
  To: listserv@azgeocaching.com<mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com> ; atl390@cox.net<mailto:atl390@cox.net> 
  Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 11:11 AM
  Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] need some assistance...


  Thanks to all who've replied.

  Ok, so I understand we are all on the same page that Garmin is the best and that in a perfect world, I should get a 60CSx or better. No one is really answering the question I asked though. 

  Anyone have any REAL actual experience with either of these 2 units?

   If not, thats ok. I would just trust a review by an avid cacher over one I found on a website somewhere unsolicited.

  Again, Thanks again to all who've responded.

  --Matt of Team AZSonburnt