Dear ShadowAce,
You make a good point. However, I want to keep almost
all the old information, i.e. logs, original owners name, location because it is
a little unique and small. It is an urban cache that most do not like but
it brings you close to some very interesting history of old Prescott. I
know that many of us have lost a container and log. I don't believe that
should be a criteria for making a totally new cache. When Michael
LaPaglia suggested I make a new cache at
the same waypoint location, it told me there was no complaint from a business
nearby. He can not or will not tell me where it is stated in policy, black
and white, that when a cache goes missing it must be archived. I know he
or someone has the technical power to un-archive this cache so I can adopt
it. I just don't know how much I want to push the issue.
Bob Smith, Prescott
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Adopting a
cache
Basically to drop all the other spam that this
became....
I would say this IMHO:
New owner, New
Cache, New Log. = New Cache
Old Container, Old Log, New Owner =
Reactivate.
Since this cache is not the cache in question, it
really is a new cache, new hide and as such deserves a new history.
Thats my opinion and I like it, your feelings will vary.
On 5/4/07, Bob &
Linda Smith <Lrsmith@cableone.net
> wrote:
OK
everyone, I need to find out why an archived cache can't be
un-archived
so the adopt program can be used. I am trying to get a
cache
back on line that the original owner can no longer
maintain. I
was told by Michael LaPaglia at GC.com that once a
cache is archived it
can not be un-archived. I am pretty sure
that I read somewhere that a
cache could be un-archived and brought back
on line. If you want to
look at the cache on line the way
point is GCJWPV
Bob and Linda Smith, Team Petite
Elite
Prescott, AZ