Ookay then.  Again, I don't know why you're taking such offense when (I'll
state it again) that it was posted to gauge interest.  I responded with what
I thought was a level-headed dialogue to explain the reasons that came out
of the whole concept once Jake decided to look at turning it into a coin.
Rather than maintaining a cool dialogue about this, you're frankly being a
smart-ass for no apparent reason.  Of course you're entitled to your
opinion, as are all others who subscribe here.  To me, it came across as an
attack on Jake and I for having the nerve to work together on a design that
we thought was a good one for representing CITO. 

 

Jared responded just before you, and frankly I took his response as an
opinion and not a criticism.  There were things he didn't like and
identified them.  I don't feel your response was anything close to what
could be defined as an opinion, but rather what I stated I felt it was
already.

 

Brian

Team A.I.

 

 

 

  _____  

From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
ShadowAce
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 1:33 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] 2007 Arizona CITO Coin

 

Chopping this down at the request of others on the list...


"The Arizona CITO Geocoin "

A one mile section of of the beeline highway was adopted by the Geocachers
of Arizona. A Physical Geocache is located near the coordinates of the sign.
C.I.T.O. Always N 33 29.705 W 111 48.280

 So this has nothing to do with you and I getting along, it is and was
simply a statement that I do not feel this represents the STATE and of
course I believed the original post was asking for opinions. I am sorry to
have given an opinion that was other then 'This is Perfect, I will buy 100' 

 Next time I wont respond when asked an opinion unless I think it is a
wonderful perfect idea.