That was exactly the
habit I was refering to.. I never used to see this, now I see it more and more
often.
Cache owners choice
at this point. You can allow them to keep the 'Finds' or you can remove there
finds.
I know a lot of
cachers will say deleting the find is evil and wrong. "You have no right to
remove a find" but I would respond with Geocaching.com says find the container,
sign the logbook.
These people should
have writing a DNF, a Note, or even a Should be archived. But there is log,
there is no container, there is no find. Just remember though, if you say
its ok for them to keep the finds then you will have no reason to be upset when
it gets to the "I got to the parking lot, thanks for the find" type of
logs.
Myself, I would
email the cacher and explain why I was deleting the found
log.
ShadowAce
I have to admit I am puzzled. the last 4 or 5
people to find my cache "It's a Duck's Life" in Tempe logged it as a find, even
though they were saying they found the "velcro." I was puzzled about
why they were logging finds but talking like it was gone.... at that point I
should have checked it, but I didn't.
Since they were all logging Smileys, I didn't give
it much thought, until a cacher emailed me that it was gone and I should do
something.
Do a lot of you find this happening on your urban
or other caches? people logging finds when the cache is missing?
It's OK with me if that's how they want to play it, but I always thought
"found it" means "It's there"!!
Mozartman