Well no, don't eliminate them. The old ones are grandfathered in since they were done before the rules change.

Ken Henson <khenson@cableone.net> wrote:

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Ken Henson
> Date: Tue Sep 9, 2003 2:49:04 PM America/Phoenix
> To: khenson@cableone.net
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 02:29 PM, Gale Draper wrote:
>
>> From the guidelines page:
>>  
>> Placing Caches on Vacation
>>
>> Placing caches on vacation is unacceptable and these caches will not
>> be approved on the web site. As the cache owner you are obligated to
>> be in a position to manage your caches, and caches placed on vacation
>> require someone else to maintain them for you. Please be responsible.
>>
>
> hmmmmmmmm.......... seems I have several vacation caches? Guess they
& gt; need to be eliminated?
>
> Straight South:
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=51340
>
> The Book
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=49867
>
> Off 190
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=45762

When these are gone some folks are going to miss some neat sights. Oh
well, rules are rules...

- Ken Henson, Prescott, AZ