It’s quite possible that this cacher does legitimately find some caches; but logs many
more than he actually found on the site.
Rand’s suggestion to e-mail the cacher
with specific questions would probably the only way to tell.
Aus Dem Kasten
-----Original Message-----
From:
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]
On Behalf Of Andrew Ayre
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:30 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching]
cheater/not cheater
I assumed (and still do) that Gale
was referring to the next entry which indicates this person went caching
with someone else. Gale - is that right?
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From:
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of RAND HARDIN
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:07 PM
To: AZ-Geocaching
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching]
cheater/not cheater
Just because a person states
"Nice location!" on the cache page doesn't mean that the
individual found the cache. In the case of the cache that you reference,
I could look at the map and determine the cache is located in a "nice
location."
It's also possible the individual
may be driving to/past the caches without actually finding them, but
is claiming them as a virtual.
I believe it's understood that a
log book/sheet must be signed at the cache location to claim a find
on the web page (unless the cache is actually a virtual and/or has other
rules for claiming a find). I have no objection to a cache owner deleting
an entry if there is no proof that the individual actually found the
cache. If there is a question from a cache owner, an email to the individual
asking to explain where and how the cache was found and/or asking for a
description of the cache should clear up some doubt.
----- Original Message -----
From: gale
'Desert Viking'
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:10 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject:
[Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater