Greetings,
I couldn't let this thread die, particularly
considering my occupation....
Now the Techno-babble:
CB uses either AM (like the commercial radio
stations) or SSB (single side band-sounds kinda like Donald Duck if its not
tuned correctly) on 27 Mhz.
FRS (and GMRS) use narrowband FM (similar to the
'other' commercial radio stations) on 460 Mhz.
The frequencies aren't the same, the mode of
modulation is not the same; therefore they can't talk to each
other.
Range of these radios is rather speculative.
It's kinda like asking how for can you see? Looking out the window I can
see the sun at something close to 93 million miles away, but if I walk into the
closet and shut the door I can't see two inches. Except during unusual
periods of atmospheric activity (and, well, ionospheric activity) these radios
are going to be limited to what is called line of sight, and often times much
less.
Trisha mentions the use of ham radio repeaters on
the 146 MHz & 440 Mhz (what's wrong with 50 Mhz, 222 Mhz (my
favorite), & 1.2 Ghz? <grin>), again you have to have line of
sight to the repeaters in order to use them, but they effectively can extend
your range, in some cases to over many thousands of square miles if you can
get a signal to the repeater.
Cell phones are actually full duplex (gwad, more
techno-babble: transmit and receive at the same time) repeaters, most on 800
Mhz. Again, you need to have line of sight to a cell site (cell
tower).
I added all these frequencies to note that
generally the higher the frequency, the more the radio frequency energy will be
absorbed by things. What kind of things? Lotsa things: snow, wet
vegetation, dry vegetation, rock, buildings, concrete, etc. Note that cell
phones are at the highest frequency, but because of the abundance of cell sites
this signal attenuation is not usually a major factor, until you go into the
backcountry where fewer sites are to be found. The receiver needs a
certain level of energy to hear the incoming signal.
Another factor in received signal strength is how
much power you transmit. CB is 4 watts (or thereabouts, but its rare to
find that in a portable radio), FRS uses 1/2 watt, cell phones use .6 watt (6/10
for those with eyes over 40 and miss the decimal point). Ham radio
portables can sometimes run to the 7 or 8 watts, but the most popular is 5
watts. Antennas figure into the equation also. Portable ham radios
can also use for more efficient antennas effectively doubling or quadrupling
their power.
Having gone through that discussion the question
remains, "Which is best for emergencies?"
In my opinion nothing beats being prepared in terms
of planning and equipment to be able to handle what is most likely to come
up. But since we can't plan for all possibilities I recommend: 1) Cell
phone because it takes no license and little skill, and the coverage is pretty
fair. 2) Ham radio, excellent coverage, great flexibility, 3) FRS/CB are
also rans. Not Rated) GMRS--cuz my experience is very limited.
As Trisha said getting a ham license is almost easy
these days--no morse code, no diagrams, just some multiple guess
questions. Pick up a copy of 'Now You're Talking' (at many Radio Shacks)
or contract you're local ham club for more info.
When I go (when I went?) geocaching I would take my
cell phone and my duo-band ham handi-talkie.
Actually, I hope that Bonnie and I will be able to
start caching again. Fire season is over (I think, Bon just told be about
a smoke report on Lemmon, but isn't there snow up there?), our house is built,
the barn is built, we're almost unpacked. I hope we will be able to run
into some of you on the trail.
I do have a new e-mail address:
wa0rto@direcway.com
Fred
Team Boulder Creek
Ham: WA0RTO
Work Coronado-91 (Radio System Manager, Coronado
NF)
Tucson, AZ