----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 10:52
PM
Subject: Re: Geocaching- AZ site
stewards
Hello Jill,
Since the article in the
Az Republic was posted this has been a major topic on the mailing
list at http://www.azgeocaching.com/ .
Brian Cluff runs this site and it is a great resource for anyone
interested in Geocaching in Arizona. I would like to suggest that you
pass this information along to any of the site stewards that have
access to the internet and encourage them to join the mailing list. This
site will enable the free flow of communications between the stewards and
the majority of the Geocaching community in Arizona.
I found the article in the
Arizona republic very poorly researched and considered it a "hit piece"
against my hobby. If the quotes made by the land stewards, to
the reporter, are accurate I found them very inflammatory and insinuated
that I violated some law. I have personally experienced the
inaccuracies of some reporters and realize the quotes may not be accurate,
or were taken out of context. Still I found the article and alleged
statements by the site stewards highly offensive. One of the reasons that
I enjoy Geocaching is the opportunity that it gives for me to show my
children (4 yrs and 11yrs) the beauty and history that our state
has to offer.
Upon reflection I realize
that it is not a good idea to place cache container too close to an
archeological site as the number of visitors looking for the cache
could have the potential to cause damage. Since the cache container
from my "Sign From The Past III" has been removed by the site steward I
have changed it to a "virtual" cache. What this means is the cache hunter
simply needs to find the petroglyps and take photograph of
them. As a virtual cache there is no need for the geocacher to
"hunt" for a hidden container and should eliminate any
possible accidental damage. As for the site It is clearly marked on a
topographical map and has a nearby 4x4 road that is only .25 miles away.
While visiting this location the only thing I noticed were the actual
glyphs and did not see any pottery shards or nearby ruins. Since the
site was posted in February it has only had 4 groups visit
it.
Ken
A.K.A.
The Evil "WhereRWee" geocacher
;)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:18
PM
Subject: Geocaching- AZ site
stewards
Ken,
Hi, apparently we have been having some
email difficulties and I did not receive your email last Friday Bryan
forwarded your message to me today. As Bryan has probably told you
I am an Arizona Site Steward. The reason I wanted to contact you
was to talk to you about geocaching. First off, I am in no way
against geocaching. In fact, I have a longtime geocacher in my site
steward region here in Yuma and he has educated me on the sport.
However, in other regions of Arizona some site steward beleive that
geocaching has been doing great harm to pristine archaeological sites by
the increase in foot and vehicle travel. Beleive me, I in no
way am saying that geocachers have no right to visit these areas.
I have visited both the Arizona and Bryan's geocaching site many,
many times and have read the logs of people removing trash from areas
and enjoying the beauty of the desert and greatly appreciate your
efforts. My goal in contacting you and other geocachers is to
expedite an answer to the conflict existing here. What I would
like to ask is if you and other geocachers who have geocaches near
archaeological or historical sites would move these caches a safe
distance from the site so that people who are only interested in
finding the cache can do that without disturbing the site. Apparently
around the Phoenix area several sites have been almost
completely destroyed and it is beleived that the extra
traffic from geocaching has played a part in this. I
think if we moved these geocaches and allowed the site stewards to
continue to monitor the sites, possibly we could then determine what
part, if any geocaching played in this. Please let me know your
feelings on this matter. I look forward to hearing your
reply.
Sincerely,
Jill
McCormick