I pointed it out in my log, then his (friend? family?) from Utah started posting on my caches about people (me) being nothing but a whiner and how this is a great imaginative idea. Thats why I am wondering just how wrong I must have been if Utah cachers will post fake found logs on other caches to defend them. On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Regan Smith wrote: > what is the GC#? > > Then again just like burried caches, way to many out there and how burried > is burried? slightly covered ect..... > > Wrong is wrong and the right thing to do is point it out and blame all the > other cache loggers for not.... > > ShadowAce wrote: > > Ok, this just strikes me as wrong, so I wondered what others think. > > City park bench and the cache owner has removed a large dome nut from the > bench. > They placed a very tiny piece of paper inside the dome nut and placed it > back on. > > To 'find and sign the cache' one must remove nuts from the city benches > until you find the correct one. > > Am I the only one who thinks parks and recreation might have a problem with > caches such as this? > > > * > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11230 > http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ > * > > ------------------------------ > > ____________________________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > Arizona's Geocaching Resourcehttp://www.azgeocaching.com > > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11230http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > http://www.azgeocaching.com > >