My thoughts exactly!
I wonder if some statistics analyst could work up a cache archival rate 
chart, taking into account the cache's age, type, and style. Shouldn't 
be much different than a human life insurance 'life expectancy' 
algorithm. :-D

Cache On!
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bob Renner wrote:
> But of your first 100 caches, how many were still
> there when you first got to 100 finds.  Since that
> occured some time ago, they have had a long time
> sitting there open to being archived.  Your most
> recent 100 finds, have not been sitting there that
> long since you found them.  In 2 years from now, these
> recent 100 caches may have a higher archive rate.
>
> Bob
>
>
> --- Roping The Wind <arizcowboy@hotmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Interesting findings... of my last 100 caches.. 92%
>> are still active. 8 are 
>> archived or disabled. So much for my theory that new
>> caches dont stand the 
>> test of time! :) (my first 100 was something like
>> 48% still active).
>>
>> Scott
>> Team Ropingthewind
>>
>>
>>
>>     
> ____________________________________________________________
>   
>> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
>> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe
>> visit:
>>
>>     
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>   
>> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>>     
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>