No one is saying one should drop gc.com and only terracache. I do not see why the idea of competition bothers some people though. Terracaching isnt advocating skirting the rules of the land agencies, nor is it attempting to bring down the level of geocaching. GC.com doesnt have virtuals and locationless caches any more. (Please dont state the party line that locationless will return - that was promised more than 2 years ago. As far as virtuals are concerned, we all know that it is nearly impossible to have them any more.) Some people want a type of caching that gc.com doesnt care for any more. Why not welcome another site that allows the other types of caches we cant get now. Why not welcome another site that expects quality in their caches. It makes me wonder if it is only about the numbers on the azgeocaching website. Given how Jeremy has been stating in the forums that he is considering removing access to see other peoples cache numbers, then even that may not be possible in the future at azgc.com. Bill Tomlinson wrote: :-) I didn't mean to say everyone would convert. It was a tongue-in-cheek jab at those that are assailing TC.com for something that is also happening at GC.com. CacheLess -----Original Message----- ... I won't be disregarding GC.com at all. ... I have no plans at all to 'convert' ... Brian Team A.I. ____________________________________________________________ Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching Arizona's Geocaching Resource http://www.azgeocaching.com Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so: "Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges -- "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!" Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898 --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball.