I'm new to this (chatty) group, having only found it a couple of weeks ago,  
and this ethical question is amusing.
 
DNF's should be left intact.  Subsequent successes should be logged  but 
previous DNFs should remain.  
 
I log all DNFs as they occur.  If I find the right spot but encounter  a 
specific problem (lost or destroyed cache, no log book, missing identifiers,  
etc.) that prevents me from claiming a find, I will just post a note in this  case 
wait for a response.  
 
Several weeks ago I found a spot and I found the piece of wood that was  
supposed to direct me to the second stage.  The writing on the wood was  
washed-out, so this was not really a DNF.  I posted a note and the owner  has not 
responded, so I haven't returned either.  
 
 
In a message dated 12/9/2004 3:13:49 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
scott@myblueheaven.com writes:

At 06:09  AM 12/8/2004, you wrote:
>This is my log from "AurorArborealis", which  you just finished.  It 
>started out as a DNF and became a found  log, while still retaining the 
>history of the cache.
>
>I  agree with your point of view about not erasing logs 100%  I just handle  
>it a little differently, and if a cache owner wanted me to have my  find 
>and my DNF on his page, I'd cheerfully comply.
>

I  think you handled that just fine.  What I have seen a lot of people do is  
completely wipe out their DNF or Note log and replace it with the find one  
once they did find it.  I think that both logs should stay in place.  


____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching  mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or  unsubscribe  visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's  Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com