Well no, don't eliminate them. The old ones are grandfathered in since they were done before the rules change. Ken Henson wrote: Begin forwarded message: > From: Ken Henson > Date: Tue Sep 9, 2003 2:49:04 PM America/Phoenix > To: khenson@cableone.net > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona? > > > On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 02:29 PM, Gale Draper wrote: > >> From the guidelines page: >> >> Placing Caches on Vacation >> >> Placing caches on vacation is unacceptable and these caches will not >> be approved on the web site. As the cache owner you are obligated to >> be in a position to manage your caches, and caches placed on vacation >> require someone else to maintain them for you. Please be responsible. >> > > hmmmmmmmm.......... seems I have several vacation caches? Guess they > need to be eliminated? > > Straight South: > http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=51340 > > The Book > http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=49867 > > Off 190 > http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=45762 When these are gone some folks are going to miss some neat sights. Oh well, rules are rules... - Ken Henson, Prescott, AZ Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so: "Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges -- "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!" Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898 --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software