I prefer forums ! On 10/22/07, Jake Olson wrote: > Actually, I've always been subscribed to get the non-digested form of the > listserv for as far back as I can remember. And I'm using gmail which > actually does a pretty good job of using the "-show quoted text-" to hide a > lot of the repeated/redundant text. Gmail also places messages that follow > a thread into a "collapse able" subject line in my inbox, so I don't have a > new subject entry for every message that is received... messages are placed > under the same subject header. As I've read new messages, it collapses and > compresses the entry under the subject header. However, there is still > quite a bit of redundant text for almost every message received. > > And simpjkee makes an excellent point about posting attachments like > pictures. > > Jake - Team A.I. > > > > On 10/22/07, AZcachemeister < azcachemeister@getnet.com> wrote: > > > > I would guess Jake must be opted for the digest format? > > I agree that posts quoting the entire thread can be overly long. > > The main problem is posters who have their EMail client set to add their > reply AFTER the text they are replying to. > > Sometime it is good to have the material being addressed available, > however. > > The same phenomenon can happen in forums as well. > > > > I see that the esteemed OP has added a reply that brings out the issue > that I originally suspected he was really concerned with, that being the > staleness of the 'news' items on the homepage. While the site owners are > willing to add fresh news items to the site, WE, THE COMMUNITY must take the > responsibility for writing them! Perhaps something as simple as a > 'shout-out' to a local who is about to, or just passed a milestone? Perhaps > something about a local event that cachers might be interested in, but is > not well publicized? How about a 'trip report' on that really cool caching > trip you took last month to...SOMEWHERE? > > > > Brian brings up some good points, but I have yet to see any really > objectionable posts on this list, and I would expect to see the same > restraint on an azgeocaching.com forum, if one should evolve. > > > > With that, I must 'vote' to maintain the status quo. I prefer to get each > post in my EMail...to be read individually throughout the day. > > > > Cache On! > > Steve > > > > Jake Olson wrote: > > > > I vote for the forum. > > > > I'm tired of scrolling through 3 miles of text to get to the next message > because people keep forwarding the complete conversation thread when they > post a response. > > > > Jake - Team A.I. > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > > > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > http://www.azgeocaching.com > >