Makes sense. I suppose then it could be submitted as a new cache with a link built into the description for the old cache, but maybe call it by the same name? Brian Team A.I. ShadowAce wrote: > Basically to drop all the other spam that this became.... > > I would say this IMHO: > > New owner, New Cache, New Log. = New Cache > > Old Container, Old Log, New Owner = Reactivate. > > Since this cache is not the cache in question, it really is a new > cache, new hide and as such deserves a new history. > > Thats my opinion and I like it, your feelings will vary. > > On 5/4/07, *Bob & Linda Smith* > wrote: > > OK everyone, I need to find out why an archived cache can't be > un-archived so the adopt program can be used. I am trying to get a > cache back on line that the original owner can no longer maintain. I > was told by Michael LaPaglia at GC.com that once a cache is > archived it > can not be un-archived. I am pretty sure that I read somewhere > that a > cache could be un-archived and brought back on line. If you want to > look at the cache on line the way point is GCJWPV > > > Bob and Linda Smith, Team Petite Elite > Prescott, AZ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ____________________________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/791 - Release Date: 5/6/2007 9:07 AM > ____________________________________________________________ Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching Arizona's Geocaching Resource http://www.azgeocaching.com