Sorry, forget I mentioned anything.I thought the whole issue was
started because a cache you wanted to list did not fit in the
guidelines!I was hoping your response might include what is or is not
acceptable in your opinion of a cache since you seemed to think
terracaching is a lot more for cachers and away from the big brother
of telling you what you can and cannot hide.


On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:11:47 -0700, Guy Aldrich <graldrich@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dirk,I never said there shouldn't be any guidelines! I think
> Terracaching is shooting themselves in the foot by allowing
> inappropriate caches! I would really like to see them succeed!
> 
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:52:59 -0800 (PST), David Thompsen
> <dthompsen@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > That was my impression of Terracaching.com as well... geocaching's answer to
> > a pyramid setup.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong.  I'm all for healthy competition.  But so far I don't
> > see anything of potential interest to me in either Terracaching.com or in
> > Navicache.  Geocaching.com is an effective monopoly -- whether you think
> > that's good or bad, it's a plain fact.  Terracaching.com seems to have been
> > started with a definite chip on their shoulder.  Not sure if that's the best
> > approach.  I too wish that virtuals and locationless still had a future at
> > GC.com, but I just don't think that TC.com is the answer for me.
> >
> > --Dave, The Cow Spots
> >
> > ke Olson <jake.teamai@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't know... TC just seems like the MLM of geocaching. you have to
> > be sponsered?
> >
> > who's running it... Amway?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:16:44 -0700, Guy Aldrich wrote:
> > > I posted this to a thread there and sent a copy to the founder of the
> > site.
> > >
> > > In the eye's of the media caches like these are not going to put this
> > > site and cachers in general in a good light.I'm trying to promote this
> > > site in Arizona and with caches like this being approved 80%or better
> > > will just not visit this site again!Did any of you think what the
> > > media might say if they saw this thread?Remember it isn't what I or
> > > you think it's what they think.I think this site has alot of great
> > > idea's and potential !Approving sexually oriented caches will insure
> > > this sites failure!
> > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> > >
> > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> > >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >  ________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> >  Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>