A group of cache approvers is an excellent idea but I'm not sure that known identies would be appropriate. After reading the forums, and hearing directly from approvers, it sounds like cachers get extremely upset when their caches aren't approved and they take their frustrations out on the approvers, both personally and publically (see other thread here on the listserv). On the other hand, I think that total anonymity is impossible. 'Cliques' already exist within this community and I strongly believe that those cachers that are buddies with approvers would EXPECT that their caches would be given preferential treatment. Even if that is not the case, perception is 90% of fact. A group of approvers could be one way to alleviate that problem. I can see either side. Maybe the formation of a "true" Association, with officers and an approval board, would be the way to go. The Association could then become the official reviewer for the state. Thoughts? LazyK - Dan -----Original Message----- From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com To: listserv@azgeocaching.com Sent: 3/6/2005 3:37 PM Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Mo' bettah caches! Also, there could be a GROUP of cache approvers for Arizona, not just one. They could be voted in by the caching community on an annual basis. They would be people we would ALL know, not hiding behind the GC.com mask of anonymity. Quality of caches would improve DRAMATICALLY if 3 out of 5 reviewers had to give it a "yes" vote before it got listed. Caches might even be pre-visited by an approver. ____________________________________________________________ Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching Arizona's Geocaching Resource http://www.azgeocaching.com