would that be like when one cacher has the cache in hand while the other is
still looking?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Cluff" <brian@Snaptek.com>
To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] 4 the Caching gods


> EvilFISH wrote:
> > yeah I know this as they were brought into the system by again your
> > programing but I wonder if there is some connection that allows them to
go
> > OOS, as after entering the GC# into the recovery process did not only
the
> > Recovery process identify the missing cache as a instate Arizona cache,
it
> > aborted as it was a archived cache, which I am sure alerted the Archive
> > process to fetch it as well...which I am sure is why they are in the
system
> > and all of TEF OSS caches are accounted for...
>
> I was just messin with you...  I moved about 50 caches that had been
> archived into the archived crawl list yesterday afternoon.  It was
> probably just after you tried recovering them.
> Anyway, I also got sick of having to do that little chore, so I
> automated it about half an hour ago.  That should keep ALL the archived
> caches that the system knows about in the archived section and generally
> keep the system a LOT more up to date.
>
> Brian Cluff
> Team Snaptek
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>