Hey Ken,
I wouldn't consider the two AZ caches "vacation" caches even tho' they
aren't that close to home....it's still the same state, at least. The
Calif one, well, I have no intelligent comment on that
one...wait...come to think of it, I haven't had an intelligent comment
today yet! :)
Trisha
Still in a rare good mood


On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:53:24 -0700, Ken Henson wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Ken Henson <khenson@cableone.net>
> > Date: Tue Sep 9, 2003  2:49:04 PM America/Phoenix
> > To: khenson@cableone.net
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
> Arizona?
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 02:29 PM, Gale Draper wrote:
> >
> >> From the guidelines page:
> >>  
> >> Placing Caches on Vacation
> >>
> >> Placing caches on vacation is unacceptable and these caches will
> not 
> >> be approved on the web site. As the cache owner you are obligated
> to 
> >> be in a position to manage your caches, and caches placed on
> vacation 
> >> require someone else to maintain them for you. Please be
> responsible.
> >>
> >
> > hmmmmmmmm..........  seems I have several vacation caches?  Guess
> they 
> > need to be eliminated?
> >
> > Straight South:
> > http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=51340
> >
> > The Book
> > http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=49867
> >
> > Off 190
> > http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=45762
> 
> When these are gone some folks are going to miss some neat sights. 
Oh 
> well, rules are rules...
> 
> - Ken Henson, Prescott, AZ