You can put a cache there anytime. Just put it within a few hundred feet of the thermometer. I have plenty of spare containers, but won't be coming to Prescott or Prescott Valley during the next month or so. If you really need a container, and will be coming to Phx on June 14, let me know. We can probably rendevous somehow. These event caches keep ending up on days when I already have something planned, so it looks like I'll probably miss the June 14 one too (same situation on Mar 8 and Mar 29). Maybe I should plan my own event cache for the long hot summer. But I would have us go to an East Indian restaurant, with hot curries, and I don't think most geocachers would like that. Mike Team Malthusian At Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:10:36 -0700, Darin & Dani wrote: > >Message: 1 >From: "Darin & Dani" <ddeehr@commspeed.net> >To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com> >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache 71199 description >Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:10:36 -0700 >Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com > >We would be interested in putting a cache near here. I printed out the >description. We have plenty of cache stuff, just need to get a container. >Let us know, Mike, if you want us to place one up there. > >Darin. > >Team DDJT + Sassie the Wonder dog. >Prescott Valley. >Fresh from the bottom of the Canyon. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Trisha" <trisha@brasher.com> >To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com> >Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:15 AM >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache 71199 description > > >> Thank you Mike for posting the text of your un-approved (but very >> interesting) cache! >> I vote for Lincoln or DDJT (or....?) to put a physical cache with a >> weather theme at this site (I would but it's a bit too much hiking for >> me....besides, I have the cache at the top still active) >> I think it would be fun if whoever put a physical cache there would >> include a print out of your virtual cache description in the cache as >> a memorial to all the unapproved but deserving caches in the world..... >> >> Trisha "Lightning" >> Prescott >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2003 17:12:08, Mike Schwarz wrote: >> >> > >> > Well, looks like the powers that be at geocaching.com set it up >> > so nobody but me can see it, even if you ARE logged in. Drats. >> > >> > Here's the text of the description I submitted, just to satisfy >> > any curiousity anyone may have about my ill-fated virtual cache. >> > Or if anyone wants to try to locate the thermometer, even though you >> > won't increase your numbers for anything by doing so. This does >> > require a 2 mile round trip hike, with 500 feet of elevation gain. >> > Unless you're doing more of the Groom Creek trail. Again, if >> > anyone does locate it, let me know via an email. And if someone >> > who lives in the Prescott area wishes to place a physical cache >> > near it, that would be great: >> > >> > NAME: What's the Temperature? >> > >> > N 34 27.750 W 112 25.526 >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Get a little workout, make a weather observation, and score a cache. >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > RATING: 1.5/2.5 >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > This is probably the first cache in Arizona that asks you to make a >> > meteorological observation! >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Mike >> > Team Malthusian >> > >> > Brian wrote: >> > > >> > >Message: 1 >> > >Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 21:38:14 -0700 >> > >From: Brian Cluff <brian@Snaptek.com> >> > >To: listserv@azgeocaching.com >> > >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Thermometer Virtual Cache rejected :( >> > >Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com >> > > >> > >Mike Schwarz wrote: >> > >> The cache is now in an archived state, and I believe it will >> > >> be viewable IF you are logged in to geocaching.com, at this URL: >> > >> >> > >> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.asp?ID=71199 >> > > >> > >> N 34 27.750 W 112 25.526 >> > > >> > >Looks like it won't let anyone but you view the cache, even if you >> > are >> > >logged in. I was going to add it to the list of archived caches, >> so >> > >that people could get credit for logging it. >> > >Oh well.. It seemed interesting to me. >> > > >> > >Brian Cluff >> > >Team Snaptek >> > > >> > > >> > >-- __--__-- >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >