Wow, I think I'm finally having the same problems everyone with Hotmail has been having. I obviously missed a couple of e-mails!

 

Yes, I was referring to the next log where he went with someone else. (Assuming you feel that can be trusted.) I have no problem with the cache owner deleting his logs if they want to. Their cache=their rules. I just wanted to point out that some of them are legitimate. The 3 virtuals I looked at show that they weren't just drive by virtuals. He did stop and take the required picture. So far, he hasn't done any of mine. When or if he does, I'll have to decide what is fair not only to him, and us, but to the other cachers who took the time to visit my caches.

How can I change my listserv e-mail to another e-mail address? There were at least 3 e-mails I didn't get today from the listserv at this address.




>From: "Aus Dem Kasten"
>Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>To:
>Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
>Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:45:34 -0700
>
>It's quite possible that this cacher does legitimately find some caches;
>but logs many more than he actually found on the site. Rand's
>suggestion to e-mail the cacher with specific questions would probably
>the only way to tell.
>
>Aus Dem Kasten
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
>Andrew Ayre
>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:30 PM
>To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
>
>I assumed (and still do) that Gale was referring to the next entry which
>indicates this person went caching with someone else. Gale - is that
>right?
>
>Andy
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of RAND
>HARDIN
>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:07 PM
>To: AZ-Geocaching
>Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
>Gale,
>
>Just because a person states "Nice location!" on the cache page doesn't
>mean that the individual found the cache. In the case of the cache that
>you reference, I could look at the map and determine the cache is
>located in a "nice location."
>
>It's also possible the individual may be driving to/past the caches
>without actually finding them, but is claiming them as a virtual.
>
>I believe it's understood that a log book/sheet must be signed at the
>cache location to claim a find on the web page (unless the cache is
>actually a virtual and/or has other rules for claiming a find). I have
>no objection to a cache owner deleting an entry if there is no proof
>that the individual actually found the cache. If there is a question
>from a cache owner, an email to the individual asking to explain where
>and how the cache was found and/or asking for a description of the cache
>should clear up some doubt.
>
>Rand
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: gale 'Desert Viking'
>Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:10 PM
>To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>Subject: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
>
>If this is the person you are referring to, check out this log entry for
>Feb/2002. http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=10655
>>t> &log=y&decrypt= There's another one I remember seeing that may
>exhonerate him. I'm still looking for it.
>
>

MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*.