--- Terry Hernlund wrote: > Maybe everyone ought to read the description and not > take the rating for static. > > -T. > [General Bracket] Terrain and Difficulty are often used as filtering tools. There's no way I'd take my daughter to a cache rated as a 4 or higher terrain. Maybe you have the time and inclination to read throughthe descriptions of, what, is AZ over 1000 caches yet? But I certainly don't. If the ratings are consistent, and people stop branching off on their own, then it becomes a lot easier to search for caches. When people do their own thing and there is no consistency, finding appropriate caches to go after is more work than fun. Think of it this way, would you get upset if you went to a four step multi-stage, that said you needed to bring a calculator, with a 1/2 rating and discovered the last stage required you to do calculus? Sure, the special equipment requirement was specified but the level of skill operating that equipment wasn't and the fact that the equipment was needed anyway, means it should be listed as a 5. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com