Actually I think they do consider me an outsider. But then I looking at the bright side. When I do finally get back to AZ I will have a lot of new caches to find. Team Sand Dollar ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 8:12 PM Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Arizona Geocachers' Shame > Okay, that's enough! Let's get a few facts on the table. > > > an 'out-of-towner' breezed into the Phoenix metro area and > > swiftly blew away the record > > and > > > We ... were appalled that a cacher from out of state should hold an > > Arizona record. > > Jeez guys ... > > 1) I lived in Arizona from mid 1993 until 2000. > > 2) I left both my kids behind to live in Arizona ... yep, they have spouses, > jobs and homes, so probably won't be leaving anytime soon. > > 3) With the kids there, do you honestly think my wife will let me retire > anyplace else but Arizona? And, don't even start with the whining about > snowbird status. > > So, although I don't presently live in Arizona, I'm would argue against the > derogatory "cacher from out of state" label. Do you now consider Loren from > Team Sand Dollar an outcast? If so, I'll accept the title, but if not, don't > throw me out because I had to move to the Midwest right before the sport was > invented. > > > At the time, we heard a lot of grumbling from others like, "Sure if we > > didn't already have so many finds, we could do that." > > Well, just ignore "Team Roping the Wind" ... honest, he'll quiet down after > awhile. > > > Now, who's up for spending next month in Illinois, picking up a couple > > hundred caches? ;-) > > I just put out nine new ones ... will that help? Actually, Chicago has some of > the best cache hunting around ... if you don't mind the dripping humidity, > mucky swamps and mosquitoes the size of roadrunners. Phoenix micros are great, > but finding a pill bottle in the middle of a hot, humid, tick and mosquito > infested forest preserve adds new meaning to frustration. By the way, a > hunting trip to Chicago is about a three hundred mile round trip . humm, you > can fly there in the same time it takes me to drive. > > > Arizona cachers, we have consequently rectified that revoltin' development. > > What, you took all month to move the bar up a couple of caches? You must > remember that I only took two weeks (14 days . not a single day more) to find > 160 caches. Yes, that's 160 caches. I know the stats only show 159, but > Highpointer was obviously so mad he changed every cache I found into a members > only cache just to reduce the count ... and I'm a dues paying member to boot. > Shame on you Ken!!! So, Team Sprocket, the challenge is 161 caches in two > weeks, not a whole month. And, no more fluffing up your count with just those > 1/1 caches either ... one cache hunt has to be "Return to Sender" ... and at > least a sprinkling of five star difficulty caches. Oh, and don't forget . you > probably should find all of the caches in the South Mountain Range . just to > make it fair. > > Okay, so now I've vented ... I'll go back to lurking. > > With tongue in cheek, > Jeepster (Tom Clark) > > Oh, by the way Scott, congrats on the 162 cache finds last month and the 55 > finds in a single day. > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > http://www.azgeocaching.com