This technology has also already been in use in the trucking industry. The trucking companies can track their trucks (and drivers) very efficiently this way, making sure the drivers are legal and all. The big difference is that in this case it is a private company and the drivers know when they sign on that they will be watched, if their company uses this technology. My 2 cents..... Trisha "Lightning" Prescott OK, I can't help it, (4 more cents) I have to say.....I am a former Kingman resident, so you can all probably figure out where I stand on the "Big Brother" issues!! We owned a firearms business in Kingman at the time the OKC bombing thing led to Kingman. We were watched, phone tapped, interviewed, records gone over (more than once)...the media calling wanting an introduction to all the "militia" members we (allegedly) knew....it was ridiculous. We were completely legal and had nothing to "fear" but it was highly annoying. "Brian Casteel" wrote: What surprises me is how the ACLU hasn't pounced all over this.  The public will not go for this, not only due to the 'Big Brother' feel it has, but for purposes the government doesn't want to admit they would like to use the technology.  Not that I'm playing conspiracy theorist or anything *grin*, but whenever something of this nature comes about, there are always those devious few who would like to see it used for greater control measures.  Hell, look at how far the magnetic guidance concept flopped after testing in S. Cal, where vehicles would be controlled by magnetic force on the road to handle speed/driving, in order to improve traffic congestion.    Technology similar to the proposed already exists in the public sector in the way of vehicle anti-theft systems.  A US-based company manufactures an alarm system that allows the vehicle to be tracked via GPS in realtime using either a computer or a cellphone.  It can also be used to control functions of the car, such as starting/stopping the engine, rolling up windows, etc...  This of course being at the absolute discretion on the part of the consumer, and not something forced on them.  To require GPS tracking in vehicles, then charging by the mile is ridiculous.    The only thing I can say in favor of this is based on a VERY limited scope where it would be of benefit.  Law enforcement could benefit from this technology by tracking a pursuit vehicle without engaging in a pursuit (or after termination), and coupled with helicopter monitoring, track the vehicle via GPS, in order to improve the chances of recovery/arrest.  However, the above mentioned reasons against the technology far outweigh this small benefit to an isolated population segment.  Just my .02   Brian Team A.I. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Although no one can go back and make a brand new start, Anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~