140 people on this list??? Holy COW! And based upon population statistics, out of 140, you are bound to have a few "nuts". Not pointing any fingers :-))))) !! ('cept at me!?) Hey all, Dan and I are getting married tomorrow. FINALLY! After his divorce was drug out and delayed about 6 months (not by him), it was finally final on Oct 31....HOW appropriate! Trisha "Lightning" Prescott Brian Cluff wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 November 2002 04:44 pm, Team Tierra Buena wrote: > > Except that Site Stewards have no enforcement powers or > > responsibilities. I believe all *they* can legally do is notify the > > appropriate authorities. If the cache is placed with permission, no > > problem. If the responsible land management agency doesn't know it's > > there or why it's there, it's litter. > > I would have no problem with Ms Rasmussen if that was all she was > doing, heck, > I would even welcome it if she did have the power to do something > about some > litter. At least if she had some power she would be expect to > punish/fine.. > whatever the correct person. > But in reality what she is doing I believe is causeing much more > damage than > any person should be allowed to cause something without following up > with > some real proof. > I know that the article was written before the meeting, but given the > tone of > the article and the way she left the meeting, I'm positive that she > hasn't > changed her mind a bit, and in fact, we will probably be the first > group of > people that she thinks of when she sees litter or damage. > I'm just afraid that if she keeps telling people that geocachers are > horrible > people over and over again that they will start to believe it. > > > number of communications channels were opened. Two: As a direct > result > > of the article, more people in Arizona started Geocaching and came to > > this web site and list server than ever before. Brian or Jason can > > correct me, but I think the number of list server subscribers has > just > > about doubled since the article ran. > > I wish it was that good of a turn out. The list went up by about 15 > people > around the time of the article. After a while the lookey loos bailed > out and > we lost almost half that many. We have over 140 people on the list > currently, so it was nowhere near half. > > On a funny note, I just got a message last week from the guy that was > accusing > us of running around his gated property and leaving trash including > condoms > lying around. He thought that we had subscribed him to the list to > get him > back for the comment, and begged me to release him from that torture. > > I just reminded him that I would never do that, and he had subscribed > himself, > and pointed him in the direction of the web page to get unsubscribed. > I > don't know if he did get unsubscribed or not though.... but I thought > it was > pretty funny that he tortured himself for his unfortunate comments. > > Brian Cluff > Team Snaptek > _______________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list > listserv@azgeocaching.com > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > http://www.azgeocaching.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Although no one can go back and make a brand new start, Anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~