I'm still "learning the ropes" as it were for Geocaching. Is it immoral to
just make up a fake location for the submission form, and then put the real
coordinates inside the description of the cache after it gets approved? Kind
of like a puzzle cache, but without the puzzle?

I know that may be a bit sneaky, but at least you could have an event cache
without it getting rejected because of location reasons.

-FroBro Q-Tip


-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Scott
Wood
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 12:59 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [RE: [Az-Geocaching] potluck picnic]


At 12:49 PM 9/5/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Has anyone written the Main Geocaching site and voiced their concern?

When this came up a few months ago with caches up north, I sent Jeremey a
message asking if there was some new policy that wasn't listed on the
webpages.

It was actually the first and only time that I got a message from Jeremey
that was somewhat rude.  He seemed to think that I was accusing him of
something, which I wasn't, but it basically came down to the admins having
flexibility to disapprove caches.  He went on to say that if it was a real
problem with a cache that I could always post it to the survey forum and
let people vote on it.  I sort of let it drop after that since it wasn't
one of my caches, and I don't believe that I should have to win some sort
of popular election to have a cache posted.


In liberty,

Scott

wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com

_______________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com