I have been reading the survey responses and many of them are quite 
interesting.  One question has come up though.

It seems that there are 2 normal answers to the question about how many 
times you look before posting a no-find log.  It seems that the answers are 
either 1 or 3.  I understand the 1, but don't really understand 3.  You 
don't wait until you find a cache 3 times before you log it as a found 
cache, so why wait until 3 if you can't find it when you go hunting?

This goes hand in hand with a question that I asked a number of months ago 
about no-find logs.  Many people won't post no-find logs but will post a 
note saying that they couldn't find the cache.  Why is this?  Do you look 
at not being able to find the cache as some sort of failure?

Thanks for posting the survey, it has been very interesting to read 
everyone replies.

In liberty,

Scott

wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com