>From: Ken Akerman >Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com >To: listserv@azgeocaching.com >Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Fortune Cookie geocache modified to two-stage >multi-cache >Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT) > > > Hello Geocachers, >It appears that the original location of my Fortune Cookie geocache is >frequently busy during the day, and some people may not feel safe visiting >that location at night. Therefore, I have relocated the cache and I have >converted it to a two-stage multi-cache. I have used the original >container as the container for the first stage that contains the >coordinates to the second stage, which is the cache itself. Both stages of >the cache are located adjacent to parking lots. The theme to the cache >remains the same. For an added bonus, stop for Krispy Kreme doughnuts >while traveling between the two stages. :) >Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ken, Is it now a new cache? Since the location (and therefore the coordinates are changed), is it physically a NEW cache? I think if a cache container moves to a new location, it therfore becomes a new cache. I have seen caches now that have been moved and not physically made into a new cache. There is also a NEW cache out that is actually an old cache. Forest Closure 2a. It has a new name and it shows up as a brand new cache in my list of caches I have not yet visited. Therefore, I see it as a new cache for me to seek and log. However, if yours changes locations, but, the the cache isnt made into a new cache, then I cant really log it again since I already logged that cache. Of course, those are just my rules to how I geocache. But, I truly beleive that if a cache moves to a new location, it should be a newly named cache. Any others have thoughts on this? Scott Team Ropingthewind _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com