Michael,

I think you may have misunderstood my comment. I
didn't say virtuals were bad; I have logged some and
have registered one as well. Side note: If anyone
watched the Amazing Race last week, my virtual cache
was also the location of the Fast Forward. My comment
about finds was wanting to see the number of finds not
including virtual caches. I never said anything about
not seeing the total number.

I agree that this isn't a competition and that
everyone has to play this game in a way that they are
comfortable with. Since everyone plays it in a
different way, there can't be long term competition. I
think that we all can respect that we have different
opinions on this, everyone is free to state their's,
and we go one with caching... err, our lives.


Eric 
TD


--- Baja Fleg <fleigle@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is funny because by far the most interesting
> cache I have ever found 
> was a virtual cache located in Texas.  I am very
> glad that someone took the 
> time to point out the location.
> After all this isn't a competition is it?  Who cares
> what someone elses 
> cache finds are.  If you don't want to look for a VC
> or a locationless cache 
> then don't....easy as that.
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> ----Original Message Follows----
> I haven't logged any and don't feel any desire to. I
> don't consider most locationless caches to be in the
> spirit of geocaching. IMO, it isn't a cache unless
> coordinates are used in some way, shape or form, to
> get to the cache spot. I would actually prefer to
> see
> find numbers that do not include virtual caches,
> even
> though many VCs do require coords.
> 
> 
> Eric
> TD
> 
> --- Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com> wrote:
>  > At 10:36 AM 4/30/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>  >
>  > >also two Historical ones amongst the
> locationless
>  > caches that could be bagged
>  > >pretty easiy.  I suspect his high rate is
> temporary
>  > as he gets to the end of
>  > >those kinds of caches, though there are many of
>  > them and a decent stream of
>  > >new ones appearing all the time.
>  >
>  > I have logged a few of those sort of caches also
> but
>  > I just don't enjoy
>  > them as much as a traditional caches.  I don't go
>  > out of my way to get
>  > them, but if I have one in the back of my mind
> and I
>  > happen across the
>  > right situation I will log it.
>  >
>  > I think that if it were completely up to me, I
>  > wouldn't allow that sort of
>  > cache.
>  >
>  >
>  > Scott
>  > Team My Blue Heaven
>  > www.myblueheaven.com/geocache
>  >
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
> http://health.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> 
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
> http://messenger.msn.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com