I haven't logged any and don't feel any desire to. I
don't consider most locationless caches to be in the
spirit of geocaching. IMO, it isn't a cache unless
coordinates are used in some way, shape or form, to
get to the cache spot. I would actually prefer to see
find numbers that do not include virtual caches, even
though many VCs do require coords.


Eric
TD

--- Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com> wrote:
> At 10:36 AM 4/30/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> 
> >also two Historical ones amongst the locationless
> caches that could be bagged
> >pretty easiy.  I suspect his high rate is temporary
> as he gets to the end of
> >those kinds of caches, though there are many of
> them and a decent stream of
> >new ones appearing all the time.
> 
> I have logged a few of those sort of caches also but
> I just don't enjoy 
> them as much as a traditional caches.  I don't go
> out of my way to get 
> them, but if I have one in the back of my mind and I
> happen across the 
> right situation I will log it.
> 
> I think that if it were completely up to me, I
> wouldn't allow that sort of 
> cache.
> 
> 
> Scott
> Team My Blue Heaven
> www.myblueheaven.com/geocache
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com