Fascinating story, Jim! Thanks (from a very amateur astronomer....) The link, however, gave me a 400 error message, when I clicked on it. ~Trisha "Lightning" On Thu, 11 April 2002, Jim Scotti wrote > > Wow, that was a fun night at the telescope! It was the night of March 25-26, > 1993 and I think it was around dinner time that David Levy called me from > Palomar about their new comet suspect. They described it and it's position > motion and brightness and I warned them that the cloudy weather that was on > top of them was going to make for an uncertain night, but that I'd be happy > to confirm their object. But I also caused them some concern by asking a few > questions, for example, their image was elongated in a way that pointed right > straight back towards Jupiter, just 4 degrees away on the sky (about 8 times > the diameter of the moon) and the object moved almost exactly like Jupiter on > the sky, so I was worried it might be an optical reflection in the telescope > of Jupiter. It was approaching midnight when David called me back about the > confirmation & I had just started the 2nd images of the comet, having just > been jolted through the ceiling by seeing it about 10 or 15 minutes earlier > for the first time. The image I had seen appeared to me as follows. As the > image read out of the CCD detector on the telescope, I saw it appear from the > west. Having confirmed a number of comets over the years and having observed > nearly 100 of them at that time, I knew what comets looked like & what to > expect, but as comets have always reminded me, one should never forget that > they can do some very interesting things. I had seen comets with two tails > and comets that had split into multiple pieces before, but all of that did > not prepare me for the image that was in the next star field! First, there > was what appeared to be a tail on my screen. At that point, I knew their > comet was no telescope reflection, but was real. Then as more of the image > appeared, there was a second tail (in the following image, the bottom of this > image appeared first on my screen). I thought - cool, nice comet! Then the > first nucleus appeared & to me it just looked like a normal, but pretty neat > comet. Then the next bit of the image appeared - it contained a whole string > of comet nuclei! I think it was that moment that my jaw dropped to the floor > in amazement. And finally, the trail on the other side of the string > appeared. Here is a URL with an image I took a couple nights later that > shows you what I saw that night: > > http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/spacewatch/Photos/p_sl9_30.jpg > > So when David called me on the phone a few minutes later, I was obviously > very excited. I told him what I saw & talked to Gene Shoemaker as well. We > even talked about how we figured that the comet must have passed very close > to Jupiter recently and have been broken up by that close passage, but we had > no idea of the show we were in store for. If someone had suggested that > night that the comet was orbiting Jupiter and would crash into the planet in > 14 months time, I would have laughed them off the mountain! > > BTW, I did not coin the term "String of Pearls", I think that was Dave Jewitt > or Jane Luu who observed it a few nights later from Hawaii. I was calling it > a train of nuclei, though. On the discovery announcment, I described the > string of nuclei as "a long narrow train" with "at least 5 discernible > condenstations" visible within the train. It was called comet Shoemaker-Levy > right away and later when found to be at least in orbit around the sun (but > not certainly Jupiter), it was called Periodic comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (or S-L > 9) since it was the 9th short period comet found by the Shoemakers and David > Levy. > > Jim. > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Jim Stamm wrote: > > > Jim Scotti wrote on 4/10/02 8:38 AM : > > > > >Between Near Earth Asteroids and comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (you may remember the > > >comet that broke up while orbiting Jupiter and crashed into the planet in > > >July 1994). > > > > What we weren't told (except by David Levy, the discoverer himself) was > > that Jim was actually the first person to see S-M 9 as a multiple object > > (I think he used the term "string of pearls"). David called Jim at the > > observatory on the night of discovery because S-M 9 looked so strange to > > the team of discoverers, and Jim visually confirmed what was later to > > become the most fantastic solar system event in human history. > > > > Have I gotten this all correct Jim? > > > > -Jim > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Az-Geocaching mailing list > > listserv@azgeocaching.com > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > > > Jim Scotti > Lunar & Planetary Laboratory jscotti@pirl.lpl.arizona.edu > University of Arizona > Tucson, AZ 85721 USA http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list > listserv@azgeocaching.com > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > http://www.azgeocaching.com