Why shouldn't it be up to geocaching.com to decide about best cache
placement?  They are the same ones who made the non-commerical site rule and
others that seem to benefit the sport.  We are free to set up our own
Geocaching site if we want.  In the meantime I would say that the place that
bears the almost sole burden of supporting this sport has earned the right
to make a few policies based on their experience.

Jeff.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Wood" <wood@myblueheaven.com>
To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Prescott Caches


> At 03:13 PM 4/3/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Anybody else who has cached in the Prescott area have
> >an opinion, and does anybody think we should
> >ask/explain to Jeremy about the area and the caches
> >here?
>
> We haven't made a caching trip to Prescott yet, but I just looked at the
> caches up there and downloaded them into ExpertGPS.  I don't see what the
> problem is.  There are at least a couple miles between each cache, and in
> many places here in Arizona a couple miles can be a real long distance.
:-)
>
> I have said it before, the thing that will drive me from this hobby the
> fastest will be some sort of geo-cops.  If people are complaining that
> caches are too close together fine, but why should it be up to
> geocaching.com to decide if there is another cache too close?
>
>
> Scott
> Team My Blue Heaven
> www.myblueheaven.com/geocache