I agree....after all, they archived my "moving day"  event cache even though
I made it very clear that helping me move was NOT a requirement. Seems they
don't like things that deviate from a few selected patterns, maybe that is a
good thing. I'm just really glad Cody and Cheryl were able to log a "find"
anyway, as they were INVALUABLE* in helping me!

~~trisha   "Lightning"

* could not have done it without them.....


----- Original Message -----
From: "Cheryl Brown" <irishcb40@hotmail.com>
To: <az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache question...


> It sounded like a good idea, but i can see why they might turn it down.
It
> sounds like you have to play to log the cache.  Maybe try just having the
> log there and have people just watch if they want.
>
> Team CBx2
>
>
> >From: Jim Scotti <jscotti@jupiter.lpl.Arizona.EDU>
> >Reply-To: az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
> >To: az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
> >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache question...
> >Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 17:33:40 -0700 (MST)
> >
> >Hey Cody,
> >    As the creator of that Bear Down NGS marker virtual cache, you don't
> >have
> >to take a picture of the NGS marker, just ID it sufficiently to verify
you
> >saw it by reading the text off the marker (don't worry about the outer
ring
> >of text about the fine and stuff).  Don't let that stop you from taking
> >pictures of it though....  Scott was correct in the webpage, so I won't
> >repeat it here.  Enjoy your visit down here in the "Old Pueblo"!  There
are
> >quite a few new geocache's down here these days and I'm way behind on
> >getting
> >out and finding them all.
> >    BTW, while I've got your attention, I'd love to hear your opinions on
> >the
> >following geocache idea.  I tried placing the following cache, but the
> >powers
> >that be decided it wasn't a valid cache and archived it immediately
instead
> >of posting it:
> >
> >http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.asp?ID=15874
> >
> >I was disappointed and argued that it had all the things it needed to be
a
> >valid cache, including a logbook and the possibility of having items
> >available for trade.  I hope I can convince them of it's validity and
> >eventually get it posted properly....
> >
> >Jim.
> >Team Scotti
> >
> >On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Cody Brown wrote:
> >
> > > What's that cache??
> > >
> > > There's another cache out there that you can claim by taking a picture
> >of a
> > > Geodetic marker.  Anybody remember which one it is.  I think Wyle
> >claimed
> > > this cache along with Tucson's "Bear Down NGS Marker".
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Cody
> > >
> >
> >Jim Scotti
> >Lunar & Planetary Laboratory         jscotti@pirl.lpl.arizona.edu
> >University of Arizona
> >Tucson, AZ 85721 USA                 http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Az-Geocaching mailing list
> >Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
> >http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
> http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>