At 11:32 AM 2/25/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I agree with Scott that there seems to be a discrepancy for how people 
>choose to log.  For us, a trek (for which we use the definition of time 
>spent out of the car and attempting to reach the coordinates) ends in 
>either a found or a not found (and a found for a traditional cache means 
>obtaining posession and logging in, not just seeing the container).

We had to log our first "can't find" Arizona log this weekend.  I don't 
feel upset about it, this one hasn't been found by a lot of different 
people. :-)  Take a look at the logs for "Scary" and you will see what I 
mean.  To be honest, I don't know if we were ever close to this one or 
not.  It is a steep hillside with LOTS of rocks and fallen trees.  My GPS 
was all over the place and I never got it to report being under about 100 
feet from the cache.  I might have felt bad about not finding it if 
everyone else had, but that is not the case for this one.

I do hope that it is still there, I REALLY want to find this one now. :-)


In liberty,

Scott

wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com