Your cache, your rules. I would have deleted them as well. They may have intended to log the trip as a note and forgot that the default is a find and didn't change it. Eric Team Dragon --- Scott Wood wrote: > At 09:51 PM 1/14/2002 -0700, you wrote: > >It's not that easy. I get emails from people > telling me that such and > >such a clue is missing. Can I check it for them? > Then I get emails > >from people who have driven 200+ miles looking for > the next clue and let > > I am having a whole new problem with the multi cache > I put out down here in > Tucson. So far I have 2 finds and 1 lost log entry. > The problem is that I > have had two other find logs that were actually not > finds. Both log > entries stated that they found the clue and planned > on following the clues > over the next month or so, but still logged the > cache as a find. > > My real complaint about this is that I have clearly > stated in the cache > description that it is not to be logged as a find > until they reach the > final location. > > I deleted the logs for both finds, and have not > received any hate mail yet, > but... > > > In liberty, > > Scott > > wood@myblueheaven.com > www.myblueheaven.com > > _______________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list > Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com > http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/