The email for both the hider and the person making the note that the cache was removed are the same. They apparently changed their caching name somewhere in between. (CK FLYERS = HILLWILLY) I wasn't implying that they HAD to post a reason - just commenting that no reason was posted. They sort of implied that they removed it themselves (at least that's the way I read it), since they just said "cache removed" rather than that it was missing or stolen, etc. I may be wrong. The reason I posted the email was to let the geocaching community know not to look for it and to let Snaptek know that there is another cache to be treated uniquely on their web site. Bob -----Original Message----- From: wolfb8 [mailto:wolfb8@qwest.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:52 AM To: az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache removed by owner. The way I read the page it seemed like it was not the person that hide the cache that removed it .......the person that posted the removed is not even from az at least I do not know the name ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:44 AM Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Cache removed by owner. > > Maybe somebody saw it (it was immediately off the road!) and either stole it, or removed it thinking it was trash. Maybe the work-release jail folks who clean up the highways removed it, maybe the Forest Service removed it....maybe the "adopt a highway" person in charge of that stretch of road removed it....maybe...maybe....did the person reporting it as removed on the log simply not find it, or did they remove it? Maybe the owner removed it....(Teri, are you the owner?) which is certainly their perogative. Hmmmm......so many possibilities, so little time. > Trisha ~~Lightning~!!~ > > But, I have to admit, I, like Bob, am curious as to why.....that's just human nature. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "az-geocaching-admin@listserv.snaptek.com" on behalf of "Teri Hall" > Sent: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 09:38:20 -0700 > To: "az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com" > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache removed by owner. > > I re-read the rules for Geocaching, and I can't find anywhere in the rules > where it states that you have to give a reason when archiving a cache. > Maybe they just don't like Geocaching anymore and want to get out of it... > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Bob Renner" > > GC1673, 34, 45.3120, -112, 05.4950, *** JEROME by CK FLYERS > > Archived. No reason given??? > > Bob > > _______________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list > Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com > http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > _______________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list > Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com > http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > _______________________________________________ > Az-Geocaching mailing list > Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com > http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > _______________________________________________ Az-Geocaching mailing list Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching