<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<BR>I made the update without any data loss, only having to refresh a couple macros. <BR>
However, a fellow cacher, told my that they lost the capability to download files to their PalmT/X. <BR>
I haven't yet confirmed this experience yet.<BR>
-ADB <BR>
<BR>> From: az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com<BR>> Subject: Az-Geocaching Digest, Vol 130, Issue 1<BR>> To: az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com<BR>> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:00:01 -0600<BR>> <BR>> Send Az-Geocaching mailing list submissions to<BR>> az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com<BR>> <BR>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<BR>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>> az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com<BR>> <BR>> You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>> az-geocaching-owner@listserv.azgeocaching.com<BR>> <BR>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>> than "Re: Contents of Az-Geocaching digest..."<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Today's Topics:<BR>> <BR>> 1. GSAK ? (AZPAUL)<BR>> 2. Re: GSAK ? (moosemob@cox.net)<BR>> 3. Re: GSAK ? (Richard Daines)<BR>> 4. Re: GSAK ? (Michael Weiner)<BR>> 5. Re: GSAK ? (AZPAUL)<BR>> 6. Re: GSAK ? (moosemob@cox.net)<BR>> 7. 'Smart' Cameras Are Watching You (AZTech)<BR>> 8. Re: 'Smart' Cameras Are Watching You (AZPAUL)<BR>> 9. Re: GSAK ? (AZPAUL)<BR>> 10. Re: GSAK ? (ShadowAce)<BR>> 11. Re: 'Smart' Cameras Are Watching You (AZcachemeister)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>> <BR>> Message: 1<BR>> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:07:59 -0700<BR>> From: AZPAUL <azpaul1@cox.net><BR>> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] GSAK ?<BR>> To: az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com<BR>> Message-ID: <4987367F.6090104@cox.net><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<BR>> <BR>> After reading the version history of 7.5.0.188, I have been a little <BR>> leery on updating my 7.2.3.35 version. Has anyone that has updated to <BR>> the newer version had any trouble with it? Does it have any issues that <BR>> might make a person not want to upgrade?<BR>> <BR>> Paul<BR>> <BR>> -- <BR><BR></body>
</html>