<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Very wrong cache idea. That could cause a lot of damage to geocachers relationship with the city parks and rec. <br><br>--- On <b>Sun, 11/30/08, ShadowAce <i><shadowace.az@gmail.com></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">From: ShadowAce <shadowace.az@gmail.com><br>Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Opinions on a cache<br>To: listserv@azgeocaching.com<br>Date: Sunday, November 30, 2008, 10:15 PM<br><br><div id="yiv229321511">Ok, this just strikes me as wrong, so I wondered what others think.<br><br>City park bench and the cache owner has removed a large dome nut from the bench. <br>They placed a very tiny piece of paper inside the dome nut and placed it back on.<br>
<br>To 'find and sign the cache' one must remove nuts from the city benches until you find the correct one.<br><br>Am I the only one who thinks parks and recreation might have a problem with caches such as this?<br>
</div><pre>____________________________________________________________<br>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<br>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:<br>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<br><br>Arizona's Geocaching Resource<br>http://www.azgeocaching.com<br></pre></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>