<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Dear ShadowAce,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>You make a good point. However, I want to keep almost
all the old information, i.e. logs, original owners name, location because it is
a little unique and small. It is an urban cache that most do not like but
it brings you close to some very interesting history of old Prescott. I
know that many of us have lost a container and log. I don't believe that
should be a criteria for making a totally new cache. When Michael
LaPaglia</FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT><FONT size=4>suggested I make a new cache at
the same waypoint location, it told me there was no complaint from a business
nearby. He can not or will not tell me where it is stated in policy, black
and white, that when a cache goes missing it must be archived. I know he
or someone has the technical power to un-archive this cache so I can adopt
it. I just don't know how much I want to push the issue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=4>Bob Smith, Prescott</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=shadowace.az@gmail.com
href="mailto:shadowace.az@gmail.com">ShadowAce</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=listserv@azgeocaching.com
href="mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, May 06, 2007 9:47 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Az-Geocaching] Adopting a
cache</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Basically to drop all the other spam that this
became....<BR><BR> I would say this IMHO:<BR><BR> New owner, New
Cache, New Log. = New Cache<BR><BR> Old Container, Old Log, New Owner =
Reactivate.<BR><BR> Since this cache is not the cache in question, it
really is a new cache, new hide and as such deserves a new history.
<BR><BR> Thats my opinion and I like it, your feelings will vary.<BR><BR>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 5/4/07, <B class=gmail_sendername>Bob &
Linda Smith</B> <<A href="mailto:Lrsmith@cableone.net">Lrsmith@cableone.net
</A>> wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">OK
everyone, I need to find out why an archived cache can't be<BR>un-archived
so the adopt program can be used. I am trying to get a<BR>cache
back on line that the original owner can no longer
maintain. I<BR>was told by Michael LaPaglia at GC.com that once a
cache is archived it<BR>can not be un-archived. I am pretty sure
that I read somewhere that a <BR>cache could be un-archived and brought back
on line. If you want to<BR>look at the cache on line the way
point is GCJWPV<BR><BR><BR>Bob and Linda Smith, Team Petite
Elite<BR>Prescott, AZ<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>