[Az-Geocaching] The same.....yeah.

[EvilFISH]

yeah on that page but that don't account that once SOMEONE made Member only
caches part way through their life the stat page has given the caching gods
more headache than they deserve.

I only wish that the one time that you were parked oh 30 feet away at a
cache(Frobro-2) that I would have actually shook your hand...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Loran Wilcox" <loranwilcox@chartermi.net>
To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] The same.....yeah.


> The fact that I'm still in the top 20 surprises me since I haven't cached
in
> AZ since 10/21/02 (not counting the one that came by Snail Mail).  And
> according to the latest standing you are one ahead of me.
>
> I still look at the available caches back there and wonder just how many
> record I could smash given some time to cache.  But it looks like work
will
> keep me here in Michigan so I'll just have to wait to get back there.
>
> As for the stuff in caches, I usually don't take items unless there
> signature items, but almost always leave a sand dollar tin.
> For me the adventure is in finding a place I haven't been to before.
>
> Team Sand Dollar
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "EvilFISH" <EvilFish@cox.net>
> To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 7:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] The same.....yeah.
>
>
> > actually a worry I have is the stuff in a cache!! has anyone noticed the
> > degradation of trade items  from a caches beginnings till its end???
isn't
> > suppose to be a take something leave something of the same/equal value??
I
> > suspect that a fair many tn ln on a full size cache is for that reason..
> >
> > ps
> > 1 more find till I pass Sand Dollar for more AZ finds :) and I only have
1
> > cache within 11 miles to be that cache...
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Loran Wilcox" <loranwilcox@chartermi.net>
> > To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 5:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] The same.....yeah.
> >
> >
> > > Just ran a pocket Query on 85248 (Chandler) and noticed that there are
> 480
> > > caches within 37 miles that I have not found.  The key here is NOT
> FOUND.
> > > From what I have noticed, there are always enough caches around to be
> > found.
> > > As long as this is true why worry about who is hiding them and who is
> > > finding them.  Just have fun caching.
> > >
> > > The only purpose of having a lot of caches is to run up numbers or
post
> > big
> > > finds for a day, month, or year.
> > >
> > > So until you run out of caches to find, don't worry about how many
have
> > been
> > > hidden.
> > >
> > > Team Sand Dollar
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> > >
> > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com