[Az-Geocaching] No Tresspassing Signs
Ford, Denny
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:04:06 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------=_NextPartTM-000-57a3d43e-4ea5-4be6-b8fd-89920cec5e7b
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3F4E1.2D6980B6"
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F4E1.2D6980B6
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I know that I have been out of the loop in Geocaching for a while, but since when is it ok to place a cache in an area
clearly marked NO Trespassing. Refer to cache GCE770- A Brick In Stalingrad. I tried to visit this cache on January
31st, and within 200 feet of where the cache should have been was not one but two NO Trespassing signs. I am sorry but
this is what gives Geocachers a bad name, as bad as the Geotrashers we were label by the Arizona Repulsive article. Am
I totally off base? This one happened to be on my way home, but if this would have been out where I drove miles to get
to it and find out it was on private property I would have been irritated to say the least. I have seen a few caches
lately place in community areas where the No Trespassing signs say for residents of HOA only but no permissions are
posted on the websites. I want to hear the feelings of others .
Ok I am down from my soap box, and have taken long breaths and counted to 10.
Annoyed Tres Hombre
Denny
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F4E1.2D6980B6
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=937424822-16022004> I know that I
have been out of the loop in Geocaching for a while, but since when is it ok to
place a cache in an area clearly marked NO Trespassing. Refer to cache
GCE770- A Brick In Stalingrad. I tried to visit this cache on January
31st, and within 200 feet of where the cache should have been was not one but
two NO Trespassing signs. I am sorry but this is what gives Geocachers a
bad name, as bad as the Geotrashers we were label by the Arizona Repulsive
article. Am I totally off base? This one happened to be on my way
home, but if this would have been out where I drove miles to get to it and find
out it was on private property I would have been irritated to say the
least. I have seen a few caches lately place in community areas
where the No Trespassing signs say for residents of HOA only but no permissions
are posted on the websites. I want to hear the feelings of others
.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=937424822-16022004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=937424822-16022004>Ok I am down from my
soap box, and have taken long breaths and counted to 10.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=937424822-16022004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=937424822-16022004>Annoyed Tres
Hombre</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=937424822-16022004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=937424822-16022004>Denny</SPAN></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F4E1.2D6980B6--
------=_NextPartTM-000-57a3d43e-4ea5-4be6-b8fd-89920cec5e7b--