[Az-Geocaching] Why don't some geocaches look for caches outside of Arizona?
Andrew Ayre
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:48:42 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C36041.9197C7D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Well, I'm sure I'm not the record holder by a long way, but I've found
caches in the USA, Mexico, Canada and England. Hopefully I will add Germany
to the list in the New Year.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Ken
Akerman
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:13 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Why don't some geocaches look for caches outside
of Arizona?
RopingTheWind wrote:
I only cache in state (AZ). . . I do have to say though that there are
some really interesting caches up here in WA and look mighty tempting! :)
Scott,
Why don't you seek caches outside of Arizona? There are many interesting
caches all over the world. One of my goals is to find at least one cache in
every state. So far I have AZ, CA, UT, NM, TX, CO, KS, WY, IL, WI, NJ, CT,
and OK (virtuals only). That's 12 states with at least one regular cache
found.
How many states have each of you found caches in? Who has found caches in
the most states? Who has found caches outside the USA, and who has found
the caches in the most foreign countries?
Ken Akerman (a.k.a. Highpointer)
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C36041.9197C7D0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D335444702-12082003>Well,=20
I'm sure I'm not the record holder by a long way, but I've found caches =
in the=20
USA, Mexico, Canada and England. Hopefully I will add Germany to the =
list in the=20
New Year.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Andy<BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com=20
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]<B>On Behalf Of =
</B>Ken=20
Akerman<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 11, 2003 6:13 PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Az-Geocaching] Why don't =
some=20
geocaches look for caches outside of Arizona?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>RopingTheWind wrote:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><EM>I only cache in state (AZ). . . I do have to say though that =
there=20
are some really interesting caches up here in WA and look mighty =
tempting!=20
:)</EM> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Scott,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Why don't you seek caches outside of Arizona? There =
are many=20
interesting caches all over the world. One of my goals is to =
find at=20
least one cache in every state. So far I have AZ, CA, UT, NM, =
TX, CO,=20
KS, WY, IL, WI, NJ, CT, and OK (virtuals only). That's 12 states =
with at=20
least one regular cache found. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>How many states have each of you found caches in? Who has =
found=20
caches in the most states? Who has found caches outside the USA, =
and who=20
has found the caches in the most foreign countries?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>Ken Akerman</STRONG> (a.k.a.=20
=
<STRONG><EM>Highpointer</EM></STRONG>)</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C36041.9197C7D0--