[Az-Geocaching] Revisiting caches over and over to get a TB?
Ford, Denny
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:47:43 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------=_NextPartTM-000-8d827a65-506a-40fd-8bfb-1abee49cb39f
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3586E.2811AE00"
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3586E.2811AE00
Content-Type: text/plain
I personally think if you are revisiting a cache for the sake of getting a TB you should trade one out, if you do not
have one to trade don't take it! I don't think this applies if it is first visit to a cache, then just trade something
according to the geocache guidelines.
that's my 2 cents
Denny
Tres Hombres
-----Original Message-----
From: IFISHAZ@aol.com [mailto:IFISHAZ@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:22 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Revisiting caches over and over to get a TB?
Ok, I could probably see that if the person was helping maintain the cache it could be ok, but without naming names, I
know of a couple of cachers who do not help maintain the cache, doesn't even log on the cache page taking of the bug
(only logs to the bug page), makes no trades for the bug thus lowering the inventory of the cache. Hense showing only an
interest in getting bugs out of the cache with not much concern for the cache or cache owner. This is where I am having
a problem seeing it as ok.
Once again just my opinion, IFISHAZ.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3586E.2811AE00
Content-Type: text/html
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=281193220-01082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I
personally think if you are revisiting a cache for the sake of getting a
TB you should trade one out, if you do not have one to trade don't take
it! I don't think this applies if it is first visit to a cache, then just
trade something according to the geocache guidelines.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=281193220-01082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=281193220-01082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>that's
my 2 cents</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=281193220-01082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=281193220-01082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Denny</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=281193220-01082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Tres
Hombres</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> IFISHAZ@aol.com
[mailto:IFISHAZ@aol.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, August 01, 2003 1:22
PM<BR><B>To:</B> listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Az-Geocaching]
Revisiting caches over and over to get a TB?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT
face=arial,helvetica><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF">Ok, I
could probably see that if the person was helping maintain the cache it could
be ok, but without naming names, I know of a couple of cachers who do not help
maintain the cache, doesn't even log on the cache page taking of the bug (only
logs to the bug page), makes no trades for the bug thus lowering the inventory
of the cache. Hense showing only an interest in getting bugs out of the cache
with not much concern for the cache or cache owner. This is where I am having
a problem seeing it as ok.<BR>Once again just my opinion, IFISHAZ.</FONT>
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C3586E.2811AE00--
------=_NextPartTM-000-8d827a65-506a-40fd-8bfb-1abee49cb39f--