[Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks
Regan Smith
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:15:38 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C2F840.06625C20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cache Permanence=20
As the Frequently Asked Questions indicate, geocaches can be hidden in a =
location for a finite period of time, depending on the environment and =
the decision of the cache owner.=20
However, when you report a cache on the web site, geocachers should (and =
will) expect the cache to be there for a realistic and extended period =
of time. Therefore, caches that have the goal to move, or temporary =
caches (ex: Caches hidden for events) will not be approved. If you wish =
to hide caches for an event, bring printouts to the event and hand them =
out there.=20
Don't need a Lawyer here what is a Realistic period of Time??? how many =
logs will fit inside a Altoids tin on a printed peice of paper....
I think they think they should conserve the GC numbers=20
I noticed on the City of Mesa Website there are 59 city parks and dogs =
are allowed in all retention basins=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Scott Wood=20
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks
At 10:47 AM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:
There are so many rules now, I can see that in five years time I =
will need to retain a lawyer to understand what I can and can't do (as =
usual) ;)
During past discussions, I have said that once the rules get too =
onerous, people will stop participating in this game. After my last =
experience hiding a virtual cache, I have to admit that I have lost most =
interest in hiding caches any longer. I will probably get over it, but =
I don't really agree with all of the new rules for hiding caches.
I would prefer to see geocaching.com remain as a depository for =
waypoints, and stay out of the rules game, but as so many other things, =
that doesn't seem to be the way things are going.
In liberty,
Scott
wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C2F840.06625C20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>
<P><STRONG>Cache Permanence</STRONG>=20
<P>As the <A href=3D"http://www.geocaching.com/faq.asp">Frequently Asked =
Questions</A> indicate, geocaches can be hidden in a location for a =
finite=20
period of time, depending on the environment and the decision of the =
cache=20
owner.=20
<P>However, when you report a cache on the web site, geocachers should =
(and=20
will) expect the cache to be there for a realistic and extended period =
of time.=20
Therefore, caches that have the goal to move, or temporary caches (ex: =
Caches=20
hidden for events) will not be approved. If you wish to hide caches for =
an=20
event, bring printouts to the event and hand them out there. </P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Don't need a Lawyer here what is a =
Realistic period=20
of Time??? how many logs will fit inside a Altoids tin on a printed =
peice of=20
paper....</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think they think they should conserve =
the GC=20
numbers </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I noticed on the City of Mesa Website =
there are 59=20
city parks and dogs are allowed in all retention basins =
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dwood@myblueheaven.com =
href=3D"mailto:wood@myblueheaven.com">Scott=20
Wood</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dlistserv@azgeocaching.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 01, 2003 =
10:57=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Az-Geocaching] =
Dog=20
Parks</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>At 10:47 AM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dcite cite=3D"" type=3D"cite"><FONT face=3Darial =
color=3D#0000ff=20
size=3D2>There are so many rules now, I can see that in five years =
time I will=20
need to retain a lawyer to understand what I can and can't do (as =
usual)=20
;)</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>During past discussions, I have said that =
once the=20
rules get too onerous, people will stop participating in this =
game. =20
After my last experience hiding a virtual cache, I have to admit that =
I have=20
lost most interest in hiding caches any longer. I will probably =
get over=20
it, but I don't really agree with all of the new rules for hiding=20
caches.<BR><BR>I would prefer to see geocaching.com remain as a =
depository for=20
waypoints, and stay out of the rules game, but as so many other =
things, that=20
doesn't seem to be the way things are going.<BR><BR><BR>
<DIV>In liberty,</DIV><BR>
<DIV>Scott</DIV><BR>
<DIV>wood@myblueheaven.com</DIV>
<DIV><A href=3D"http://www.myblueheaven.com/"=20
=
EUDORA=3D"AUTOURL">www.myblueheaven.com</A></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HT=
ML>
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C2F840.06625C20--